Between Subjects

Between Subjects

What the famous studies actually found.

Short videos about psychology, behavioural science and animal cognition — what the well-known studies actually found, and where the popular retelling departs from the record. Milgram’s fourth prod, the Dunning-Kruger chart that is not in the Dunning-Kruger paper, the biologist who spent twenty years trying to unpublish “alpha wolf”.

YouTubeTikTok

Why the retelling drifts

A finding gets simpler every time it is repeated. The qualifier goes first, then the sample size, then the condition that made it work. What is left is a clean story that the paper does not support — and it is usually the version that gets taught.

These videos go back to what was actually measured. Often the real finding is stranger than the myth: Milgram ran more than twenty variations and the prod that sounded most like a direct order was the one nobody obeyed; Robbers Cave worked on the second attempt, after the first collapsed because the boys had been allowed to become friends first.

Just as often the correction cuts the other way. The Kitty Genovese story is mostly wrong and the bystander effect is real anyway. Saying so is the point — how each episode is checked.

Latest episodes

All 31 episodes →